![]() |
St Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary - About the Seminary Articles |
From the Culture Currents column of The Handmaiden, vol. 4#1:
An interview with Deborah Belonick:
An Orthodox Response to Feminism
Deborah Belonick is a graduate of Saint Vladimir's Orthodox Seminary. Her Master of Divinity thesis has been published as a booklet entitled Feminism in Christianity: An Orthodox / Christian Perspective. She and her husband, Fr. Steven, have two sons, Paul and Daniel. They serve the Dormition of the Virgin Mary parish in Binghamton, New York. Though she does not receive any profits from the book, copies may be ordered from the Department of Religious Education of the OCA by calling Barbara Kucynda in Wayne, New Jersey, or from Light and Life Publishing.
At present Deborah Belonick and her husband Fr Steven are on the staff at St Vladimir's Seminary. This article is reproduced on the SVS website by permission. (Ed.)
Handmaiden: I am protected from feminist ideology by the Orthodox all-male
clergy and diaconate. Why should I need to know anything more about it?
Deborah Belonick: First, this question contains some presuppositions to which
I do not subscribe! In my Orthodox upbringing, I never felt I had to be "protected" from
my surrounding culture or entirely isolate myself from it. However, I do need
to discern good from evil in any trend or political movement and, as an Orthodox
Christian, shed the light of Jesus Christ on any situation. In my opinion,
the women's movement has supplied us with both positive and negative influences.
Also this question disavows the illustrious history of the female diaconate,
saints who in the opinion of many scholars, were part of the clergy. For an
overview of that history, including information about the existing order, may
I suggest a newly published book by Dr. Kyriaki Karidoyanes Fitzgerald, Women
Deacons in the Orthodox Church: Called to Holiness and Ministry (Brookline,
MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 1998).
Handmaiden: Define a feminist. Has this definition changed in the last
20–30 years, since the movement appeared on the American cultural scene? In
your opinion, do you think that a woman can be a feminist and a committed Orthodox
Christian at the same time?
Deborah Belonick: In the
early stages of the women's movement, a feminist was a person who defined herself
according to her own experience rather than a
traditional cultural overlay of expectations. She also was a person who claimed
equal dignity and legal polity with men. I think those basic suppositions still
exist, and I think that a committed Orthodox Christian certainly could align
herself with them. Many of the women saints acted in accordance with these
principles. The problem with feminism is not with these general suppositions—to
which I subscribe—but that without a relationship to Jesus Christ these dogmas
degenerate into self-absorbed rights, which take a bitter toll upon women.
For example, if a woman practices sexual freedom in order to claim equality
with male indiscretion, she certainly is not calculating the calamitous effects
on her bodily and emotional health. She is not counting the cost of her so-called
liberation. On the other hand, we cannot all be cast into rigid, culturally
approved roles.
Our myriad personalities and talents just are not suited to them. Fresh out
of high school, I tried to fit into one of the few professions approved for
women—nurse, teacher, secretary—by suffering through nursing school for one-and-one-half
years. I had to swab my sensitive nose with Vicks VapoRub so the unpleasant
hospital odors wouldn't deck me! Needless to say, I was ecstatic to change
my field of study to journalism, which, among others, became an acceptable
profession for women.
Handmaiden: Where is the battle for truth raging most intensely today,
as it pertains to radical feminism?
Deborah Belonick: I suppose
the expected answer would be to recount the negative influences of the feminist
movement, which feed what we Orthodox would call
the "passions" of
the flesh—ambition for wealth, self-absorption, self-will, self-gratification,
and pride. I think prior to the movement, society expected women to maintain
at least a modicum of selfless interest in others, spirituality, and modesty.
Women used to climb the pedestal of those ideals, but the feminist movement
toppled that tower. Now no one models those traits, and instead of men aspiring
to them, women are imitating the worst of the "man's world." I do not think, however, that this is the only area in which the devil has worked.
There are pervasive, but subtle, philosophies present in our culture that force
women to choose between two caricatures. We are given only the choice between
being a savvy, tough CEO who consistently challenges men, or a wimpy housewife.
We are forced to read either Ms. Magazine or The Total Woman, neither of which
I would recommend. We are forced to support either a unisex model lacking any
hint of femininity, or a submissive, silent, supposedly biblical, impersonation
of what a woman is. What we need is an in-depth study of femininity from our
Orthodox Christian Tradition, but what I've seen published so far really are
no more than both these philosophies dressed up in Orthodox trappings. The
devil keeps this dichotomous battle raging between the two camps, and no one
is speaking the truth. Everyone has a favorite Bible verse. Well, one of my
favorites is, "Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had
made" (Genesis 3:1). I think the devil has used deception to keep women polarized
in these two illusory camps.
Handmaiden: The feminist movement has not had an impact on the Orthodox
priesthood directly. Yet parishioners constantly encounter feminist ideology
at the intersection of Orthodox belief and the culture at large, including
the American educational system. What things should we be aware of in this
regard?
Deborah Belonick: First, I should inform you that because of the feminist movement
many Orthodox Christians have questioned the logic behind an all-male priesthood.
Currently, there is a rather civil, subdued debate among Orthodox theologians
regarding this topic, and varied points of view are expressed in a book edited
by Very Rev. Thomas Hopko, Women and the Priesthood (Crestwood, NY: Saint Vladimir's
Seminary Press, 1999). Well-known Orthodox writers who find theological support
for women's ordination include Dr. Elizabeth Behr-Sigel, Metropolitan Anthony
Bloom, Dr. Constantinos Yokarinis, and Dr. Valerie Karras. These scholars theorize
that Scripture, the writings of the Church Fathers, doctrines of Church councils,
and Orthodox spirituality support the ordination of women. The crux of the
issue is the significance of gender and its relationship to the priesthood
of Jesus Christ. These proponents claim that femininity and masculinity are
inconsequential to human existence, salvation in Christ, and holiness,
and will be eradicated in the Kingdom of Heaven. Although I disagree with this
anthropological premise, as my article in Hopko's book Testing the Spirits
clearly indicates, I must say that this is a question worthy of debate. I welcome
the theological discussion surrounding this issue, in hopes that it will clarify
for us Orthodox the true meaning and significance of masculinity and femininity.
As far as the American educational system, my husband, my two sons, and I were
all educated in public schools. At a very young age, I was able to discern
the differences between what school taught and what I learned from the liturgical
church services and church school, not only in intellectual content but in
the general atmosphere of both places. I think my life in the Orthodox Church
made me far less gullible than most. Reading our kids' textbooks, supplying
them with additional resources from outside the system, and engaging them in
debates at home will help them develop discerning minds.
Handmaiden: Why did God reveal Himself to us as Father, and why is it
so important that, in terms of gender, we not make His name neutral?
Deborah Belonick: Feminist theologians claim that Jesus chose this name so
as not to insult or shock the Jews, or that the clergy exalted this name so
as to keep males in a position of power. No! God revealed himself as Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit, because he is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! He could
not reveal himself otherwise. Scripture says: "For
this reason I bow my knees before the Father, from whom every family [lit.
fatherhood, patria] in heaven and on earth is named" (Ephesians 3:14, 15). It is very interesting that in the fourth century there
were debates concerning the names for God. The Arians, who did not believe
in the divinity of Jesus Christ, wanted to call the Trinity "Creator, Savior, and Sanctifier," to rid the Godhead of fleshly, foolish connotations. The Church insisted on
the terms Father, Son, and Holy Spirit on the basis of God's revelation through
Jesus Christ. Actually, the patristic writers say there are three classes of
names for God. The first class contains names referring to God's actions toward
us humans, and in this group we find masculine, feminine, and neutral terms:
rock, redeemer, mother hen, sanctifying fire, and so on. The second class contains
names referring to God's essence, his unnameable nature, and in this group
we find all negative terms: ineffable, inconceivable, incomprehensible, since
the mystery of the divinity cannot be uttered. The third class contains the
personal names for God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, which refer neither to
God's actions toward us nor to his divine nature, but to the inner relationships
among the members of the Trinity. We humans had access to the first two classes
of names before the revelation of Jesus Christ. It was with the appearance
and teaching of Jesus that we came to know something about the inner mystery of the Trinity,
that there is a Father who has a Son and a Spirit, and that these three Beings
in relationship comprise the Godhead. That is only a brief explanation. For
a fuller one, may I encourage your readers to peruse my article "Testing the Spirits" in Women and the Priesthood.
Handmaiden: What are the greatest threats the radical feminist mindset
presents to the holy Church today?
Deborah Belonick: As I have implied, the Church does not live in a vacuum.
The attitudes of us Christians will be influenced by any cultural trend. The
challenge is to discern what is of God in that trend. What I see as not of
God are several feminist tenets, including: (1) Expecting women to tend to
two jobs—a professional career plus homemaking and child rearing—without becoming
overly stressed; (2) A higher value placed on holding a profession than raising
children; (3) An insistence that there are no psychological differences between
women and men; (4) An insistence that femininity and masculinity have no innate
basis, but merely are cultural categories. In fairness, I admit that feminism
really is a reaction against a cultural framework which also was not of God.
While at Kent State University as a student reporter, I covered the unfolding
consequences of Title IX, the federal act which forced federally funded educational
entities to provide equal sports facilities and opportunities to women. When
I saw women
developing their physical prowess as well as their academic skills to their
utmost abilities, I was exhilarated. The problem is, in the fight to become
politically and legally on equal ground with men, women have been forced to
ignore their authentic distinctiveness. This is the tragedy of the women's
movement. In some ways it has helped women tremendously; in other areas, it
has been their nemesis.
Handmaiden: What do the feminists, in your opinion, have to say to the
Church that we need to hear?
Deborah Belonick: When I began to study the history of women in the Church,
I discovered the early Christian women were much more emancipated than women
in our parishes today. In the face of cultural taboo, they became missionaries,
evangelists, prophetesses, teachers, and counselors. I discovered the illustrious
history of women in the diaconate. Because my Master of Divinity thesis at
Saint Vladimir's Orthodox Seminary was a comparative study between feminist
theology and traditional Orthodox theology, I was given several opportunities
to speak to women's groups, both Orthodox and non-Orthodox. Amidst these groups,
I heard harrowing tales of how these Christian women had been degraded in their
own parishes, all in the name of Christianity. Some were denied reading the
Scripture in church. Many were made to feel dirty because of their menstrual
cycles. Many were denied positions on church councils or teaching positions.
This is not Orthodox, and it shows an ignorance of our history. Do we know,
for example, that
Saint Gorgonia, sister of Saint Gregory, bishop of Nazianzus, once entered
the altar area to be healed of a malignant disease? Holding fast to the altar
table, she prayed and cried all night, proclaiming she would not loose her
hold until she had been cured. And she was. All these "thou shalt nots" regarding women in the Orthodox Church are nothing but cultural or Pharisaical
or Western influences. The feminist movement has at least interested us in
excavating the truth about women in the Orthodox Church, and for that we should
be grateful.
Handmaiden: Tell us why you know for certain that our holy Orthodox Church
is not sexist, and why we do not ordain, nor will we ever ordain, women as
priests.
Deborah Belonick: This question assumes a lot! In fact, the practices and attitudes
in many of our parishes are sexist. When people ask me to what jurisdiction
I belong, I jokingly tell them I belong to the "Theoretical
Orthodox Church." That is, I believe the Tradition of the Holy Spirit, expressed in the lives
of the women saints, is not sexist. But when Scripture, the canons of the Church,
and the Church Fathers are read with a fallen mind, people skew the proper
attitude toward women. Unless we are willing to look at the whole history of
women in the Church and not just select a few passages to support our prejudices,
the Holy Orthodox Church will appear neither holy nor Orthodox. That certainly
happens in many places. As far as women priests, I would hope the attitude
would be: If there truly are theological reasons based on the councils and
doctrines of the Church for ordaining women, by all means, let's ordain them
rather than, "Let's make the Orthodox Church the last stronghold of male chauvinism!" However, I personally do not see any theological support for the ordination
of women and view the current reasoning to do so as errant. Those supporting
women's ordination base their thesis on the point that sexual distinction is
irrelevant, created only in prevision of the Fall, and will not exist in the
Kingdom of God. I submit that all of those premises are a misinterpretation
of the writings of the Church Fathers. Very Rev. John Breck has written an
excellent rebuttal to these aberrant interpretations in his book The Sacred
Gift of Life (Crestwood, NY: Saint Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1998; see pp.
69–83).
Handmaiden: Are there areas we may have overlooked, which you would like
our Handmaiden readers to know about?
Deborah Belonick: Please discover for yourselves the history of women in the
Church, not from commentaries, but from primary source material, as far as
you are able. Also, please realize I am fallible, but I have shared with you
twenty years of thought and research in this interview. I hope it has sparked
your interest in this topic and has given you a different perspective on this
very complicated and difficult issue. As Orthodox, we cannot align ourselves
into the clear-cut camps offered to us by the Western mind. We must pick and
choose what is true and not true in each particular instance. For example,
I am against the ordination of women to the priesthood, but very much for the
ordination of women to the diaconate. Let us not let the devil force us into
monolithic categories and caricatures. As Orthodox, let us continue to seek
the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit.
The above article first appeared in The Handmaiden, volume 4 number 1,
pages 57 to 64. Published by Conciliar Press. Used by permission; all rights
reserved.